Thursday, May 16, 2024

Mosiah 11 - 17

Abinadi

How did Alma obtain knowledge of Christ? He heard the preaching of Abinadi, an itinerant prophet martyred by the wicked Noah. And Alma1 “did write all the words which Abinadi had spoken” (Mosiah 17:4). Where did Abinadi, who appears suddenly in the narrative with no background or introduction, get his knowledge? In chapters 13 and 14 of Mosiah, we see him reading the words of Moses and of Isaiah to Noah’s court, finding in them clear foreshadowing of a “God [who should] himself . . . come down among the children of men, and . . . redeem his people” (18:1). Where did Abinadi obtain those scriptures? He was a member of Zeniff’s colony, which was an offshoot of the major Nephite settlement, and apparently, they took copies of the Nephite records with them when they departed Zarahemla and resettled Lehi–Nephi.  

Givens, Terryl. 2nd Nephi (The Book of Mormon: Brief Theological Introductions). The Neal A Maxwell Institute for Religious Scholarship. Kindle Edition. 


Abinadi is Jacob’s unquestionable doctrinal heir. Faced with Noah’s priests who seem, as will be seen, to have inherited (and likely distorted) only Nephi’s covenantal focus, Abinadi criticizes them by setting forth the soteriology that they apparently overlooked through their focus on a strictly covenantal theology. Moreover, Abinadi’s discourse borders on being a commentary on 2 Nephi 9 (as well as on 2 Nephi 2), revealing his familiarity with Jacob’s teachings. And Abinadi—through his influence on Alma—seems thereby to have launched a two-centuries-long Nephite focus on soteriology. Abinadi thus appears in Mosiah as the double heir of Jacob, as much doctrinally or theologically as narratively or historically. Joseph Spencer - https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1007&context=mi


. . . Abinadi is indeed a prophet’s prophet. He’s much more like a classic Old Testament prophet than Nephi or Benjamin. Rather than being a king, Abinadi is an outsider. He is . . . eccentric and incorrigible. He’s alien and fierce. He appears to blow in from nowhere, a nobody, without power or reputation, crying repentance and prophesying destruction. He’s hunted for two years until he reappears to seal his testimony. And where Nephi and Benjamin both report stunning revelations delivered by angels, Abinadi’s final message is shaped by an interpretive contest with Noah’s priests, a contest that turns on who, at the end of the day, can actually read and understand Isaiah.

Miller, Adam S.; Welch, Rosalynde F.. Seven Gospels: The Many Lives of Christ in the Book of Mormon (p. 56). Deseret Book Company. Kindle Edition. 


Q: What does the Lord mean when he says he is jealous? 

“According to Donna Nielsen, a knowledge of the biblical marriage imagery can greatly enrich our understanding of how God relates to us through covenants. In Mosiah 11:22 we find the Lord declaring to his covenant people that "they shall know that I am the Lord their God, and am a jealous God, visiting the iniquities of my people." Nielsen notes that the biblical definition of "jealous" (or "zealous") includes having a fiery concern and determination to protect the intimacy of the covenant relationship. It is not about being possessive in a selfish way or showing immature insecurity. It is an appropriate reaction to the intense preciousness of the relationship with the other partner.”


Other Disguises in Biblical Narratives
Yet when this story is compared to biblical stories which also deal with prophetic messengers, kings, and disguises, it seems that there is likely more to Abinadi’s disguise than initially meets the eye.

This story has several parallels with biblical narratives that also deal with prophetic messengers, kings, and disguises. These include (1) King Saul disguising himself in order to receive guidance from the witch of Endor (1 Samuel 28), (2) a prophet disguising himself in order to condemn King Ahab for not executing a Syrian King (1 Kings 20), (3) an Israelite king disguising himself to avoid harm in battle, only to be slain by an archer (1 Kings 22), (4) Josiah disguising himself in order to meet with an Egyptian Pharaoh (2 Chronicles 35; 2 Kings 23), and (5) Jeroboam’s wife disguising herself to visit a blind prophet concerning her son’s illness (1 Kings 14).

Biblical scholar Richard Coggins has explained that in these types of biblical narratives, “one of the parties disguises himself (or in one case herself), but the disguise is penetrated, and God’s will is conveyed in a form which is liable to be quite unacceptable to the one seeking it.”
Coggins “also argued that the appearance of prophetic disguises in several Old Testament stories, all from the same historical period, is “surely not simply a matter of coincidence.” Rather, with the use of a prophetic disguise, “a theological point is being made.”

These stories typically depict a contest or conflict between God and an earthly king. As Alan Goff has noted, “All of the kings or their heirs in the biblical disguise stories meet with brutal deaths, and in each case the dynasty fails.” The same outcome befell King Noah, who was burned to death by his own people and whose dynasty ended after the reign of his son (Mosiah 19:20).

As for the disguise itself, it’s notable that right before it is mentioned in the text, the narrator reported that the “eyes of the people were blinded” (Mosiah 11:29). This suggests that the disguise typifies the inability of wicked people to discern between truth and error. King Noah himself arrogantly asked, “Who is Abinadi, that I and my people should be judged of him, or who is the Lord, that shall bring upon my people such great affliction?” (Mosiah 11:27). Although Noah’s question was surely meant to be rhetorical, it ironically demonstrates his personal lack of spiritual perception. He could discern neither the Lord nor his prophetic servant.



“Clearly, there is more to Abinadi’s disguise than meets the eye. Hiding beneath the surface, the text pursues its own thematic purposes by developing a complex network of allusions to biblical disguise stories that also feature kings and prophets. “Whoever wrote the Book of Mormon text,” Goff concluded, “seems to have had a sharp eye for detail and is far beyond any contemporary readers in subtlety and knowledge of the Bible.”


Pentecost
Both of Abinadi’s speeches deal with the themes of Pentecost. He reversed the festival’s blessings and rejoicing, and turned them into curses and predictions of gloom. At the time when a bounteous grain season would have been at hand, Abinadi cursed the crops: he prophesied that hail, dry winds, and insects shall ruin “their grain” (Mosiah 12:6). While Israel’s deliverance from bondage was traditionally being celebrated, Abinadi called upon Exodus terminology to proclaim that bondage and burdens would return to the wicked people in the city of Nephi: “They shall be brought into bondage; . . . and none shall deliver them” (Mosiah 11:21, 23), “and I will cause that they shall have burdens lashed upon their backs” (Mosiah 12:2, 5; compare Exodus 1:11). Jack Welch, "Abinadi and Pentecost."

“Their eyes were surely opened, though, when Abinadi’s disguise (whatever its physical nature) was symbolically unveiled and “his face shone with exceeding luster, even as Moses’ did while in the mount of Sinai” (Mosiah 13:5). Whether or not they had already identified him as Abinadi the preacher, there would have been no question at this point that they were dealing with Abinadi the prophet.” KnoWhy. https://knowhy.bookofmormoncentral.org/knowhy/why-did-abinadi-use-a-disguise


Just as Benjamin’s gospel depicts the life of Jesus Christ in terms that resonate with Benjamin’s own experience, Abinadi bears a resemblance to the Redeemer of his gospel. Christ, like Abinadi, comes in disguise. Jesus takes upon him a body of flesh with “no form nor comeliness . . . [nor] beauty that we should desire him,” which hinders the people from understanding his full identity as God himself (Mosiah 14:2). Like Abinadi, the unknown Christ manifests miraculous power with and in his human body. Both are bound, scourged, and led before a hostile tribunal. And both are delivered up to “suffer even until death” (Mosiah 17:10). One role of a prophet is to stand in for God as a surrogate before his people, and Abinadi seals his surrogacy with his own life.

Miller, Adam S.; Welch, Rosalynde F.. Seven Gospels: The Many Lives of Christ in the Book of Mormon (p. 51). Deseret Book Company. Kindle Edition. 


Just like the Jews in Jesus' day had a different idea of what they were expecting with the Messiah, it seems that the priests of King Noah's court also lack this understanding. To be fair, Peter lacked this understanding. This was hard for people to understand. The expectation was the Messiah is going to come in great power, and he's going to be this political leader who's going to free us from this oppression that we have so that when Jesus comes and now remember that scene where he's standing before Pilate, and he's bound, and the people are crying out, "Crucify him, crucify him," this can't be the Messiah, because our Messiah is going to break the bonds of oppression. Think of Peter in Matthew 16, "Thou art the Christ, the Messiah, the son of the living God," but it's the same exact chapter that Jesus is going to prophesy and say, "I'm going to be taken, and I'm going to be killed, and I'm going to rise again the third day."
Ryan Sharp - Follow Him Podcast


Abinadi in Court - Contrasts
Abinadi, on the other hand, appears to have no friends. When he shows up calling the people to repentance, he seems to come out of nowhere (Mosiah 11:20). When he disappears for two years, we have no idea where he goes (Mosiah 12:1). When he is arrested, nobody speaks on his behalf. When he is tried, he calls no witness to testify to his innocence, except the words of an ancient prophet (Mosiah 14:1). It’s only when Abinadi is condemned to death that the priest Alma speaks in his defense, though it’s not clear that Abinadi is aware of Alma’s advocacy and in any case Alma is soon expelled (Mosiah 17:2-3). In the end, Abinadi dies as he (apparently) ministered: an isolated figure without social or family attachments (Mosiah 17:20).

Noah, on the contrary, runs from his death--literally. First, he begs for his life from Gideon when cornered on his tower (see Mosiah 19:8). Later, he commands his men to abandon their wives and children to flee Lamanite forces (see Mosiah 19:11).

Rosalynde F. Welch



Abinadi’s Influence on Others
We see the great righteousness one very righteous man can cause to take place among the children of men." Not only Abinadi and his influence, but then in chapter 17, there was one among them, these priests, and he believed. And then what does Alma do? He hides out and he begins to write the words of Abinadi. And then what does he do in chapter 18? He begins to teach the words of Abinadi. And it's the words of Abinadi that lead to the conversion of 450 souls at the end of Mosiah 18. And then it's Alma and his son Alma. And then the story of Alma the Younger connected with the sons of Mosiah gets us into the missionary work of the sons of Mosiah and their conversion is going to impact King Lamoni and the Queen, his father and the entire anti-Nephi-Lehi's. And then you have Alma's son, Helaman, and his son Helaman, and then as we mentioned at the beginning of this, the Nephi's. Until finally we get to the end of 3rd and 4th Nephi, the culmination, the climax of the Book of Mormon. This moment and the impact of Abinadi is truly going to transform the rest of Nephite civilization all the way up through 3rd and 4th Nephi.
Ryan Sharp


Abinadi as the Angel Who Appeared to King Benjamin
Remember - Professor Andrew Skinner has considered the angel who directed King Benjamin as Gabriel because of similar language.

The cluster of parallels surrounding the voice of the angel prompts the question, did the same angel appear to Abinadi as appeared to King Benjamin? While we cannot know for certain, some have speculatively suggested another possibility—that Abinadi may have been the angel that appeared to King Benjamin.[41] While such an assertion must be extremely tentative, it is interesting to note that King Benjamin frequently refers to the angelic messenger (see Mosiah 3:2–3; 4:1, 11). In addition, those in King Benjamin’s audience specifically reference the words of the angel, further emphasizing the importance of the angel in King Benjamin’s discourse (see Mosiah 5:5). In contrast, there is no mention of angels anywhere in the pericope surrounding Abinadi and those who heard his message, suggesting that an angelic messenger may not have played an important role in Abinadi’s ministry. If Abinadi was the angel who appeared to Benjamin, his words have an additional influence in the Book of Mormon through King Benjamin’s important speech. This potential influence is not tangential in understanding Book of Mormon teachings. If Abinadi did teach King Benjamin (or another angel taught Abinadi’s words to King Benjamin), then Abinadi is the first prophetic witness found in Mormon’s abridgment of the large plates of Nephi, influencing all prophetic voices after him.
John Hilton III - “Abinadi’s Legacy,” Abinadi: He Came Among Them in Disguise



How will Abinadi influence us? 

“Comfort is the God of our generation” - Matt Chandler and Megan Fate Marshman
Comfortable, easy - Abinadi did not take the comfortable easy road for the Savior

Romans 8:28-29 - “And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose. For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren.”

Whatever the “thing is” God will use that to help us conform to the image of the Son.







Thursday, May 9, 2024

Mosiah 7 - 10



The Journey:

Mosiah 1--------------------Benjamin-----------------------Mosiah 2


Zeniff-------------Noah-----------Limhi

Quote #1 – The geographical, temporal, and interpersonal dimensions of the book of Mosiah are often cited as one of the most complexly impressive sections in the entire Book of Mormon. This complexity and the satisfying resolution of each scenario into the overall story is rightly seen by many to be one of the strongest evidences of the divine authenticity and historicity of the Book of Mormon. Why would Joseph Smith choose to include a storyline where it is extremely difficult to follow the many characters, locations, twists, and turns – a narrative that requires a diagram for readers to follow to keep track of all the details? 
John W. Welch

Quote #2 – Why did Zeniff want to return to the land of Nephi?
Was Zarahemla oppressive like the Israelites in Egypt? Were they hoping to return
from an exile of sorts and to rebuild the temple that Nephi had constructed as Ezra had
done in Judea? Was it their intention to go somewhere that they could live a higher,
more integrated form of their religion? Note that they had taken priests with them –
priests who would later be replaced by Noah’s political allies.

Quote #3 – Limhi declared his lineage and identified its ultimate authority in
Zarahemla. Ammon is no king, but his lineage likewise links him to Zarahemla, both
the king (his ancestor) and the land (the current political regime). Ammon, a lineal
Zarahemlaite, was entrusted with the mission of finding a dynasty founded by a
lineal/cultural Nephite from the original city of Nephi. Such an assignment suggests
that the Zarahemlaites were thoroughly accepted as participants in Benjamin’s new
covenant. Had there been any continuing animosity between the descendants of Nephi
and the descendants of Zarahemla, then almost certainly, the mission would have
been given to a descendant of Nephi." 
Gardner, Second Witness, 204.

Quote #4 – The right words have been selected from the words of Limhi in order to
clearly communicate his main message that he and his people were in bondage
because they had sinned. Limhi was definitely aware of this. As king, he gathered his
people at the temple and reminded them that God had saved their ancestors,
reiterating the miracle of the Israelites crossing the Red Sea on dry ground. “That
same God has brought our fathers out of the land of Jerusalem, and has kept and
preserved his people even until now.” But, “it is because of our iniquities and
abominations that he has brought us into bondage.” In the context of the Exodus
theology, returning to bondage could mean nothing less than returning to slavery,
which the Israelites had known in Egypt before Moses delivered them. To Limhi’s
people, who had returned to the Land of Nephi in order to reclaim the traditional temple
in that city, nothing could have been more inspiring than Limhi’s impassioned temple
speech reminding his people – and us too – to keep our covenants.
John W. Welch

Quote #5 – Limhi identified 3 reasons why his people were in bondage to the
Lamanites. The first was that Zeniff was overzealous to inherit the land of his fathers.
To be overzealous means to go beyond what is necessary. The second cause was
transgression. As Joseph Smith taught: “The moment we revolt at anything which
comes from God, the devil takes power.” Limhi’s third cause of bondage was the
Nephites slaying of the prophet Abinadi. While other things may lead into bondage,
these three causes outlined by King Limhi are typical reasons for any time period.
Nyman, “Bondage and Deliverance,” 263-264.

Quote #6 – Interestingly, Ammon either had with him a copy of King Benjamin’s
speech or he knew it by memory, for he “rehearsed unto the people of Limhi the last
words which King Benjamin had taught them, and explained them.” Ammon and King
Limhi most likely believed that this people would benefit by knowing the revelations
that Benjamin had given his people, and also by following Benjamin’s public laws,
since these statutes and ordinances had already proven to be very beneficial to all the
people of Zarahemla. John W. Welch

Quote #7 – The 24 Jaredite plates were translated by Mosiah 2, and then abridged by
Moroni. Benjamin’s father Mosiah 1 had earlier translated a Jaredite stele through
supernatural means, presumably the interpreters. This translation did not make it into
the Book of Mormon. Presumably, the 24 Jaredite plates gave the same or a better
history.

MAP

Scholars estimate that the distance between the land of Nephi and Zarahemla was no
more than 200 miles. The inability to find Zarahemla is curious. While there might have 
been some issues in arriving at the appropriate pass through the mountains, the instructions 
should have been simple. Zarahemla lay along the Sidon, and the Sidon had its headwaters in the
higher elevation (typically mountains) to the south of Zarahemla. There must have
been either some alive who had made the journey, or it was in the stories of their
fathers. The instructions must have been to go to the mountains, find the river, and
follow it to Zarahemla. They must have done so, yet they missed Zarahemla. How
could that happen?

If we accept a Mesoamerican setting, there are two rivers which begin not too far
distant from each other in the Cuchamatanes Mountains. The difficult part of the
journey appears to have been between the headwaters of the river and the land of
Zarahemla. Even Ammon’s party had wandered for a while, which had to be after they
left the river.

The best explanation for Limhi’s party is that they wandered to the mountains, found
the headwaters of a river, and followed it. It was the wrong river. At the end of the river,
they found the remains of a civilization. Following the second river would have led
them to lands northward that had once been Jaredite lands. 
Book of Mormon Minute by Brant Gardner.

It is quite probable that those 43 men returned to King Limhi thinking they had failed
because they had not accomplished their intended mission, which was finding
Zarahemla. It is also quite possible; however, that the Lord had a very different mission
in mind, finding the Jaredite record, and in that they were very successful.

Quote #8 – Elder John A. Widtsoe described a seer as “one who sees with spiritual
eyes. He perceives the meaning of that which seems obscure to others; therefore he is
an interpreter and clarifier of eternal truth. He foresees the future from the past and the
present. This he does by the power of the Lord operating through him directly, or
indirectly with the aid of divine instruments such as the Urim and Thummim. In short,
he is one who sees, who walks in the Lord’s light with open eyes.”
He also taught: “A prophet is a teacher of known truth; a seer is a perceiver of hidden
truth; a revelator is a bearer of new truth. In the widest sense, the one most commonly
used, the title prophet includes the other titles and makes of the prophet, a teacher,
perceiver, and bearer of truth.” 
Evidences and Reconciliations, 258.

Quote #9 – One who used interpreters was called a seer, clearly because the user
saw something when they were being used. It was a term with which the Book of
Mormon’s 19 th century audience was familiar. The question many have asked about the
interpreters Mosiah used is: “Where did they come from?” The question is typically
asked because there is an assumption that there was only a single set of interpreters.
There is no reason to make that assumption. Mesoamerican shamans even to this day,
use items, sometimes stones, as a means of seeing what otherwise could not be seen.
The importance that will be emphasized concerns the seer, not the specific mechanism
the seer uses. Joseph Smith used various seer stones in addition to the interpreters
that were buried with the plates. There is no need to suppose any reason that the
ancient Nephites could not have had their own stones without waiting upon Jaredite
stones. 
Book of Mormon Minute by Brant Gardner.

Quote #10 – Who was Zeniff? He was the leader of a group of Nephites who left
Zarahemla in the hope of re-establishing themselves in their ancestral lands. Initially,
Zeniff had been part of a Nephite faction that intended to take back their former land by
force. Zeniff saw that there was good among the Lamanites, and desired that his
leader withdraw his military objectives. For advocating this alternative view, Zeniff was
condemned to death. His rescue came at a terrible price, leaving the greater part of the
group dead; a surviving few (fifty) returned to Zarahemla. Zeniff returned to Lamanite
territory with a new group of colonists and made a dubious covenant with the Lamanite
king. He was then made king over his people. 
Largey Book of Mormon Reference Companion, 802.

Quote #11 – A subtle warning is presented in verse 3. There is nothing wrong with
being zealous (which means energetic, dynamic, dedicated) in a cause, but over-
zealousness can be dangerous and an example of a strength becoming a weakness.
Apparently, Zeniff was obsessed with the idea of resettling the old homeland, and he
was blinded by the motives of the Lamanite king, who took advantage of him. Wisdom
suggests that we avoid becoming overzealous and instead keep things in balance.
Ogden and Skinner, Book of Mormon 1:332.

Quote #12 – While we question the wisdom of Zeniff, we could ask if the same kind of
zeal causes people today to make agreements or sign contracts that will ultimately
place them in political or financial bondage. Individuals can be over-zealous from
material possessions, or they can become so involved in a cause or in their work, or a
relationship that they begin to neglect the weightier matters that are most important,
such as God, family, church, and service to others. (Williams, “Deliverance from
Bondage 263)

Quote #13 – When Zeniff and his people went to return to the land of Nephi, they did
so without the guidance of their prophet. Years before, when Mosiah and his followers
had originally fled from the land of Nephi, they were guided in the wilderness by the
word of God; and led by the power of His arm. However, when Zeniff and his followers
ventured back, they experienced the opposite. They were smitten with famine and sore
afflictions; for they were slow to remember the Lord their God. They decided to retake
a land that the Lord had commanded them to flee from only years – likely not even a
generation – previously. In doing so, they stumbled, fell, and made many errors. Many
people died and even more suffered because Zeniff and his followers decided that they
knew the will of the Lord better than His appointed leaders did.

Quote #14 – One of the great errors made by Zeniff and those who followed him, as
well as by those on the first expedition, was their desire to act according to their own
timing and not the Lord’s. The Lord may have intended for the land of Nephi to be
reclaimed eventually, but the Zeniffites decided to advance that timeline.

Quote #15 – It is important to remember that overzealousness does not equate to
wickedness. Zeniff made unfortunate mistakes, but those mistakes did not make him
unrighteous. Latter-day Saint writer Val Larsen had this to say about Zeniff’s path:
“This doesn’t mean Zeniff was a wicked man. He wasn’t, and that is a key part of
Mormon’s message. The importance of following prophets is all the more apparent
because Zeniff was a good, not a bad man. And yet, by rejecting prophetic leadership,
he placed himself in circumstances that turned him into precisely the kind of person he
least wanted to be.”

Quote #16 – Mormon’s inclusion of Zeniff and his record is a warning to latter-day
readers to beware of overzealousness and rejecting prophetic counsel as a result.
Even in the Zeniffites’ mistakes, Mormon shows that the Lord still protected them and
similarly, the Lord will not forsake us. 
Scripture Central, KnowWhy #730; May 7, 2024

Quote #17 – Elder David A. Bednar taught how the Lord’s strength helps us: “In the
Bible Dictionary we learn that the word grace frequently is used in the scriptures to
connote a strengthening or enabling power. Thus, the enabling and strengthening
aspect of the Atonement helps us to see and to do and to become good in ways that
we could never recognize or accomplish with our limited mortal capacity. In the
strength of the Lord we can do and endure and overcome all things.” 
David A. Bednar – “In the Strength of the Lord." 

Quote #18 – Impressive were King Zeniff’s heroics while defending his kingdom
against Lamanite invasion including guards placed “round about the land” and spies.
When the Lamanites finally attacked, Zeniff led virtually the entire male population into
battle. Thus, although Zeniff’s people went “up in the strength of the Lord to battle”,
victory was due in no small part to King Zeniff’s tactical prowess and battlefield valor.
(Kerr, “Ancient Aspects of Nephite Kingship,” 90)

Quote #19 – As I began to examine these narratives side by side – the Lamanites
calling the Nephites robbers, and the Nephites describing the Lamanites as
bloodthirsty savages who teach their children to hate – I couldn’t help but think more
deeply about the consequences of such stories. They ultimately fueled centuries of
conflict that cost countless lives. The stories we tell, whether they emphasize a
common enemy or common humanity, shape us. The stories take a toll.

Quote #20 – I’m impressed how Christ’s ministry changes the stories that Nephites
and Lamanites tell about each other. In fact, he erases the distinction between them. In
3 Nephi, we go nearly twenty chapters with no mention of the word “Nephite,” and with
only positive reference to the word “Lamanites.” The Savior saw Lehi’s descendants as
a unified body, rather than defining them by their differences. As soon as Christ was
among them, “there was not any manner of –ites.” 
Bryan Gentry, “Stories of War and Peace.”

Maxwell Institute - Mosiah 7-10: Redemption from the Regret of Overzealousness by J.B. Haws https://mi.byu.edu/news-blog-section/come-follow-me-may-6-12-mosiah-7-10


Saturday, May 4, 2024

Mosiah 4-6

BOOK OF MOSIAH

King Benjamin’s sermon, which appears at the beginning of the book, happens after most of the events in the book. In particular, Abinadi’s sermon to King Noah, the other major sermons in the book, actually occurred many years earlier.

Immediately after King Benjamin’s sermon, we read about the end of King Limhi’s (Nephite descendant) story, as a search party led by Ammon (Zarahemla descendant) discovers them in chapters seven and eight.

We then rewind to understand the history (Zenniff leaves Zarahmela to find the land of Lehi-Nephi) which led to the captivity of Limhi and his people. After reading about Limhi’s captivity for the second time (chapters 19-22), we rewind briefly again, to learn about the parallel captivity of Alma and his people (in chapters 23-24).

Finally, everyone comes together again in chapter 25, which actually occurs only a few years after King Benjamin’s sermon.

SEEING THE THEMES OF THE BOOK OF MOSIAH

One of the most noticeable themes in Mosiah is deliverance, which takes several forms. There are instances of physical deliverance for entire communities, as when the peoples of Limhi and Alma were freed from Lamanite bondage and of spiritual deliverance for groups like Benjamin’s subjects who received a remission of their sins and peace of conscience and also for individuals such as Alma. Yet while the overall message of God’s tender mercies is clear, the book of Mosiah is not naively didactic. It includes accounts of wicked people who escape the consequence of their sins, at least for a while (King Noah and his priests), and innocent or good people who are not spared trial and suffering. These include Abiniadi, the daughters of the Lamanites and again, the people of Alma.

Grant Hardy, The Annotated Book of Mormon, pg. 228

HISTORY OF THE PEOPLE OF ZARAHEMLA

A pattern to notice is that Mormon streamlines Nephite history, apparently in an effort to shape reader responses. Specifically, he reduces the story of three peoples—Mulekites, Nephites and Lamanites—to just the latter two, thus avoiding any discussion of distinct Mulekite traditions, customs, or sensibilities. Amaleki reported that a few Nephite refugees, led by Mosiah, had discovered a city of Juahites who had come to the New World some 350 years earlier, shortly after the arrival of Lehi. They were ruled by Zarahemla and they no longer spoke Hebrew, having brought no written record. Zarahemla and his people were thrilled to learn of the Brass Plates, and indeed learned the language the Nephites and invited Mosiah to become their king. It is a strange turn of events that invites further explanation, which Mormon never provides.

Instead, there are brief references to the Nephites and the people of Zarahemla continuing to be separate but allied peoples for at least three generations, with the latter greatly outnumbering the former. In Mosiah 25, Zarahemla is identified as a descendent of Mulek, and then in Helaman 6 there is a stunning revelation noted only in passing: “the land north was called Mulek, which was after the son of Zedekiah [the last kind of Judah]; for the Lord did bring Mulek into the land north, and Lehi into the land south.” This means that Zarahemla belonged to the royal line of David, and thus would have had a legitimate claim to the throne of Juhah according to the Davidic covenant, as preserved in the Nephites’ Brass Plates.

It is reasonable to assume that a few priests would have accompanied Mulek, son of King Zedekiah when his party was led by God to the New World.

Grant Hardy, The Annotated Book of Mormon, pg. 222

GATHERING AT THE TEMPLE

The description of the event has families coming to the temple and surrounding the area while they stayed in their tents. Scholars have suggested that this is sufficiently similar to the Feast of Tabernacles, that it may have been that holy day that king Benjamin used as the springboard for his abdication.

The Feast of Tabernacles looked back to Yahweh’s protection while Israel wandered in the wilderness. The tents, or booths, represented temporary dwellings meant to invoke that time. The idea that families would be together in them fits with the nature of the festival.

An interesting possibility is that while the festival looked backward, it may have also signaled a looking forward to a future time of salvation by Yahweh, a time of a future Messiah. In the New Testament, John 7:37–38, Jesus uses the great feast day to preach of himself as the living water, declaring himself the Messiah.

If there was such a tangential understanding that the feast would look forward to the Messiah, it makes an even stronger platform for the subject of king Benjamin’s speech.

Grant Hardy, https://archive.bookofmormoncentral.org/content/mosiah-2

LESSONS FROM THE BEGGAR

The Book of Mormon establishes social equality as an ideal. This is not social equalness. There is no suggestion that all people are the same, only that we should not act as though we are superior to others. The damage is not in the difference, but in the attitude of separation. Therefore, Benjamin notes that if one does not share his or her substance because of selfishness, their “substance shall perish with [them].” Of course, that is true of all, but the point is that when one thinks of oneself as valuable because of their possessions, when they leave those possessions behind in death, there is nothing left of value because of the poverty of character.

Grant Hardy, https://archive.bookofmormoncentral.org/content/mosiah-4