PAUL
“The life of the Apostle Paul is a part of the history of the world, and cannot be detached from it. We cannot explain that history without admitting the fact that he lived, and that he exerted an important influence in making the world what it has been, and what it is, and what it is to be. No great mind is ever made which does not affect and mold the future. Homer still sings; Demosthenes still pleads for liberty; Socrates still speaks to men; Solon and Lycurgus still live in the laws of nations; and even the ancient warriors still affect the destiny of mankind. Saul of Tarsus has influenced more minds than they; and any one of them would be less missed in the history of the world than he would be. If all the results of his living could be taken into the account, it would probably be found that no man of that age—orator, soldier, philosopher, statesman, poet, or legislator—did as much to affect the permanent condition of the world in future times as he did. The influence of most of those who were his contemporaries was limited to a particular country; his influence has extended far already over the nations of the earth, has been augmenting constantly since his death, and will live on to the end of time. When their names shall all die away, his will remain in fresh and ever-enduring and ever-enlarging vigor. In eighteen hundred years, there has not been a generation which has not been influenced by him.”
https://www.biblestudytools.com/classics/barnes-scenes-in-life/death-of-the-apostle-paul.html
HEBREWS THEME AND PURPOSE
“The author’s purpose is to persuade the audience not to turn from Christianity toward Judaism or toward a more conservative Jewish Christianity but to endure hardship, recognize the superiority of Jesus Christ, rely on him as sacrifice and high priest, draw on the examples of faith found in the Old Testament, and avoid apostasy.”
Lincoln H. Blumell, Frank F. Judd Jr., and George A. Pierce https://rsc.byu.edu/new-testament-history-culture-society/hebrews-general-epistles
CONDESCENSION OF JESUS
“The wonder of the Lord’s condescension is most meaningful when we contemplate how far He descended. The irony of the Jews’ rejection of Him pierces more deeply when we contemplate who He had been for them before He came to earth.
For example, before the Lord Omnipotent came to earth, He was known as the Creator of all things from the beginning. Contrast that with the Jews’ query, ‘Is not this the carpenter?’ The Creator of all things became a carpenter.
Similarly, consider the contrast between ‘Shepherd’ and ‘Lamb.’ In the Old Testament the Lord was called the ‘Shepherd of Israel.’ Isaiah described Him as the One who gathers His lambs with His arm. In His earthly life, that lamb-gathering Shepherd became God’s Lamb, sacrificed for Israel and for the whole world.
Consider this difference. Before Jesus came to earth He was called ‘the Father of heaven and earth.’ On earth He was mistaken as ‘the son of Joseph.’
When the Israelites were finally ready to enter the promised land, it was Jehovah who stopped the River Jordan and made it stand in its place so His people could cross on dry ground. Contrast His power in performing that miracle with His humility when, as Jesus of Nazareth, He was immersed by John in the same River Jordan.
In ancient Israel, Jehovah spared thousands and thousands of firstborn sons on the night of the Passover. When He came to earth in the flesh, Jesus raised from the dead the only son of a widow.”
https://site.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/ensign/2011/12/the-condescension-of-jesus-christ
MORALISTIC THERAPEUTIC DEISM
As Christian Smith and Melinda Lundquist Denton explained, Moralistic Therapeutic Deism "is about inculcating a moralistic approach to life. It teaches that central to living a good and happy life is being a good, moral person. That means being nice, kind, pleasant, respectful, responsible, at work on self-improvement, taking care of one's health, and doing one's best to be successful." In a very real sense, that appears to be true of the faith commitment, insofar as this can be described as a faith commitment, held by a large percentage of Americans. These individuals, whatever their age, believe that religion should be centered in being "nice"--a posture that many believe is directly violated by assertions of strong theological conviction.
In addition, Moralistic Therapeutic Deism presents a unique understanding of God. As Smith explains, this amorphous faith "is about belief in a particular kind of God: one who exists, created the world, and defines our general moral order, but not one who is particularly personally involved in one's affairs-- especially affairs in which one would prefer not to have God involved. Most of the time, the God of this faith keeps a safe distance."
Consider this remarkable assessment: "Other more accomplished scholars in these areas will have to examine and evaluate these possibilities in greater depth. But we can say here that we have come with some confidence to believe that a significant part of Christianity in the United States is actually [only] tenuously Christian in any sense that is seriously connected to the actual historical Christian tradition, but is rather substantially morphed into Christianity's misbegotten step-cousin, Christian Moralistic Therapeutic Deism."
They argue that this distortion of Christianity has taken root not only in the minds of individuals, but also "within the structures of at least some Christian organizations and institutions."
How can you tell? "The language, and therefore experience, of Trinity, holiness, sin, grace, justification, sanctification, church, . . . and heaven and hell appear, among most Christian teenagers in the United States at the very least, to be supplanted by the language of happiness, niceness, and an earned heavenly reward."
https://albertmohler.com/2005/04/11/moralistic-therapeutic-deism-the-new-american-religion-2