THE PURPOSE OF JOHN’S GOSPEL
“Two features of John’s Gospel seem particularly important for explaining the difference in how John chose to portray these events. The first is John’s unusually high Christology. Christology focuses on the person and work of Jesus by explaining what it means for Jesus to be the Son of God and emphasizing what He did for the salvation of mankind. The different themes and perspectives of each Gospel author result in slightly different Christological emphases. For instance, while all four Gospels agree on the work of Jesus—namely that He died for the sins of the world and conquered death through the Resurrection—they focus on different aspects of His role as the Son of God. Mark, for instance, focuses on Jesus’s authoritative ministry, beginning his account with God recognizing Jesus as His Son at Jesus’s baptism and demonstrating through Jesus’s miracles and teaching authority that He is God’s Son. Matthew and Luke go back further, showing that Jesus is indeed the Son of God because of His divine conception and miraculous birth.”
“John, however, exhibits a preexistence Christology, teaching that Jesus was the Divine Son ‘in the beginning’ (John 1:1) and revealing that His divinity continued, barely hidden, throughout His mortal ministry. This Christological stance led John to portray Jesus differently than the other Gospels, emphasizing His strength, downplaying His suffering, and focusing on how Jesus accomplished His atoning mission alone. The second feature of John’s Gospel that substantively affected his Passion narrative is the thematic symbolism of Jesus as the Lamb of God. Jesus is explicitly identified as the Lamb of God at the beginning of the Gospel, and this symbolism reemerges implicitly at the end of the Gospel, where the focus is on Jesus’s sacrificial death, where Jesus, like a paschal lamb, sheds His blood so that death— spiritual as well as physical—may pass over His people.”
Eric Huntsman, https://rsc.byu.edu/sites/default/files/pub_content/pdf/03%20Huntsman.pdf
JOHN THE BAPTIST
“Soon after John’s birth, miraculous events surrounded the newborn. Zacharias’s voice was dramatically restored, allowing him to pronounce the Benedictus, a prophetic blessing upon his son. Filled with the Holy Ghost, Zacharias prophesied the intertwining of his son’s and Jesus’s missions (see Luke 1:67–79). John would be ‘the prophet of the Highest’ (Luke 1:76) called to go before him to prepare the way by teaching salvation through baptism for the remission of sins (see Joseph Smith Translation, Luke 1:76). At this time, John also was ‘ordained’ by an angel, presumably Gabriel, to his mission ‘to overthrow the kingdom of the Jews, and to make straight the way of the Lord before the face of his people, to prepare them for the coming of the Lord, in whose hand is given all power’ (D&C 84:28). This was not, however, an ordination to the priesthood because the Levitical Priesthood came as a birthright with responsibilities beginning at the age of twenty-five or thirty (see Numbers 4:3; 8:23–26). Elder Bruce R. McConkie noted that John yet needed baptism and other preparations. President Joseph Fielding Smith declared that the ordination came from an angel because ‘John received certain keys of authority which his father Zacharias did not possess.’ No one else in Judea at that time held these keys or had recorded an outpouring of blessings under such miraculous circumstances.”
“Similar to Jesus, John probably began his ministry at age thirty (see Luke 3:23), announcing, ‘I am he who was spoken of by the prophet Esaias [Isaiah].’ Many from Jerusalem and surrounding areas came to hear him preach and to be baptized in the Jordan River at Bethabara (see 1 Nephi 10:9; Matthew 3:5–6; Mark 1:4–5; Luke 3:3). The Prophet Joseph Smith declared that ‘the kingdom of God for a season seemed to rest with John alone’ with this reasoning: John was ‘a legal administrator, . . . the laws and oracles of God were there; therefore the kingdom of God was there.’ Further, the Prophet Joseph explained, ‘It is evident the kingdom of God was on the earth, and John prepared subjects for the kingdom by preaching the Gospel to them and baptizing them.’ As the last legal administrator and prophet of the old dispensation and the first legal administrator and prophet of the new dispensation, Jesus ‘submitted to that authority Himself.’ Because John was both the last of the prophets under the law of Moses (see D&C 84:27) and the first of the prophets in the new dispensation, he held the priesthood keys of authority to which the mortal Jesus presented himself for baptism.”
“Joseph Smith gave three reasons why Jesus called John great:
First. He was entrusted with a divine mission of preparing the way before the face of the Lord. Whoever had such a trust committed to him before or since? No man.
Secondly. He was entrusted with the important mission, and it was required at his hands, to baptize the Son of Man. Whoever had the honor doing that? Whoever had so great a privilege and glory? Whoever led the Son of God into the waters of baptism, and had the privilege of beholding the Holy Ghost descend in the form of a dove. . . .
Thirdly. John, at that time was the only legal administrator in the affairs of the kingdom there was then on earth. And holding the keys of power, the Jews had to obey his instructions or be damned, by their own law; and Christ himself fulfilled all righteousness in becoming obedient to the law which he had given to Moses on the mount, and thereby magnified it and made it honorable, instead of destroying it. The son of Zacharias wrested the keys, the kingdom, the power, the glory from the Jews, by the holy anointing and decree of heaven, and these three reasons constitute him the greatest prophet born of woman.”
https://rsc.byu.edu/vol-10-no-2-2009/john-baptist-miracle-mission
GUILE
“Having guile means we have an agenda of our own and the well-being of the other person is not our real concern.”
Dr. Lili Anderson
“A person without guile is a person of innocence, honest intent, and pure motives, whose life reflects the simple practice of conforming his daily actions to principles of integrity.”
Joseph B. Wirthlin
JOHN THE BELOVED
“As I reflect on John’s writings, I am encouraged. I see a man who had grown in His relationship with his Savior to a deeper level of intimacy than he shared with Jesus during His earthly ministry.
I find that John was closer to Jesus after He left than he was when He was physically present. As I ponder my desire for that in my own life, I surprisingly find that I already have it. In fact, His love for me and the love we share continues to deepen.
However, I’d like to confess; I am not satisfied in being just a disciple. I want to be in Jesus’ inner circle, and more than that, I want to be His closest friend. For He is my closest friend; why couldn’t I be His?
I think this would be the epitome of my devotion to Him, to be able to refer to myself in the same way John did, as ‘the disciple who Jesus loved.’
Thus, to be able to tell others that I, too, am ‘the disciple who Jesus loved’ is what I strive for. In fact, we should all desire to have that kind of relationship with Him.”
https://www.christianity.com/wiki/bible/why-did-john-call-himself-the-disciple-who-jesus-loved.html